Compound Engineering Setup
Interactive setup for compound-engineering.local.md β configures which agents run during /workflows:review and /workflows:work.
Step 1: Check Existing Config
Read compound-engineering.local.md in the project root. If it exists, display current settings summary and use AskUserQuestion:
question: "Settings file already exists. What would you like to do?"
header: "Config"
options:
- label: "Reconfigure"
description: "Run the interactive setup again from scratch"
- label: "View current"
description: "Show the file contents, then stop"
- label: "Cancel"
description: "Keep current settings"
If "View current": read and display the file, then stop. If "Cancel": stop.
Step 2: Detect and Ask
Auto-detect the project stack:
test -f Gemfile && test -f config/routes.rb && echo "rails" || \ test -f Gemfile && echo "ruby" || \ test -f tsconfig.json && echo "typescript" || \ test -f package.json && echo "javascript" || \ test -f pyproject.toml && echo "python" || \ test -f requirements.txt && echo "python" || \ echo "general"
Use AskUserQuestion:
question: "Detected {type} project. How would you like to configure?"
header: "Setup"
options:
- label: "Auto-configure (Recommended)"
description: "Use smart defaults for {type}. Done in one click."
- label: "Customize"
description: "Choose stack, focus areas, and review depth."
If Auto-configure β Skip to Step 4 with defaults:
- Rails:
[kieran-rails-reviewer, dhh-rails-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - Python:
[kieran-python-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - TypeScript:
[kieran-typescript-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - General:
[code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle, architecture-strategist]
If Customize β Step 3
Step 3: Customize (3 questions)
a. Stack β confirm or override:
question: "Which stack should we optimize for?"
header: "Stack"
options:
- label: "{detected_type} (Recommended)"
description: "Auto-detected from project files"
- label: "Rails"
description: "Ruby on Rails β adds DHH-style and Rails-specific reviewers"
- label: "Python"
description: "Python β adds Pythonic pattern reviewer"
- label: "TypeScript"
description: "TypeScript β adds type safety reviewer"
Only show options that differ from the detected type.
b. Focus areas β multiSelect:
question: "Which review areas matter most?"
header: "Focus"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "Security"
description: "Vulnerability scanning, auth, input validation (security-sentinel)"
- label: "Performance"
description: "N+1 queries, memory leaks, complexity (performance-oracle)"
- label: "Architecture"
description: "Design patterns, SOLID, separation of concerns (architecture-strategist)"
- label: "Code simplicity"
description: "Over-engineering, YAGNI violations (code-simplicity-reviewer)"
c. Depth:
question: "How thorough should reviews be?"
header: "Depth"
options:
- label: "Thorough (Recommended)"
description: "Stack reviewers + all selected focus agents."
- label: "Fast"
description: "Stack reviewers + code simplicity only. Less context, quicker."
- label: "Comprehensive"
description: "All above + git history, data integrity, agent-native checks."
Step 4: Build Agent List and Write File
Stack-specific agents:
- Rails β
kieran-rails-reviewer, dhh-rails-reviewer - Python β
kieran-python-reviewer - TypeScript β
kieran-typescript-reviewer - General β (none)
Focus area agents:
- Security β
security-sentinel - Performance β
performance-oracle - Architecture β
architecture-strategist - Code simplicity β
code-simplicity-reviewer
Depth:
- Thorough: stack + selected focus areas
- Fast: stack +
code-simplicity-revieweronly - Comprehensive: all above +
git-history-analyzer, data-integrity-guardian, agent-native-reviewer
Plan review agents: stack-specific reviewer + code-simplicity-reviewer.
Write compound-engineering.local.md:
--- review_agents: [{computed agent list}] plan_review_agents: [{computed plan agent list}] --- # Review Context Add project-specific review instructions here. These notes are passed to all review agents during /workflows:review and /workflows:work. Examples: - "We use Turbo Frames heavily β check for frame-busting issues" - "Our API is public β extra scrutiny on input validation" - "Performance-critical: we serve 10k req/s on this endpoint"
Step 5: Confirm
Saved to compound-engineering.local.md
Stack: {type}
Review depth: {depth}
Agents: {count} configured
{agent list, one per line}
Tip: Edit the "Review Context" section to add project-specific instructions.
Re-run this setup anytime to reconfigure.